Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chicken Tuna
Appearance
This is an archive of past discussions on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
This page is an archive of the discussion surrounding the proposed deletion of the page entitled Chicken Tuna.
This page is kept as an historic record.
The result of the debate was to merge and redirect to Newlyweds.
No idea what this is about. Doesn't look notable to me. Tom- 20:46, 31 May 2004 (UTC)
- It's a minor bit of pop-cultural ephemera. I might have to say delete, but I really don't care that much. Meelar 21:01, 31 May 2004 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect to Newlyweds. Brilliant content. Andrewa 21:04, 31 May 2004 (UTC)
- Pop culture ephemera, as I've argued in other deletion debates, takes up little space, and if, God willing, Wikipedia is around in 20 years, will be really useful to anyone reading texts that are currently contemporary. I wholly support having articles long after one's fifteen minutes have elapsed. Snowspinner 21:18, May 31, 2004 (UTC)
- Merge with Newlyweds, which needs expansion; it's already in Jessica Simpson's article in abbreviated form. I don't think they got the quote quite right, though. Everyking 21:31, 31 May 2004 (UTC)
- merge content. --Jiang 21:32, 31 May 2004 (UTC)
- Merged content, now a redir. Meelar 05:12, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue or the deletion should be placed on other relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.